[Rear-users] Backing up to tape-drive and OBDR
dag at wieers.com
Thu Jul 29 10:40:24 CEST 2010
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> I guess the README was a bit driven by wishful thinking...
> I remember culling the OBDR stuff when I met it in the docs and website
> but apparently I missed a few places.
> Yes, I would also like to see it. But you should know that since 2006
> when we release ReaR 1.0 you are the first person to ask about OBDR...
But we selected Rear for a number of reasons, one was OBDR support and now
we discover it's not really functional :-/ Not that we had a lot of
> Do you want to use OBDR as a single-media DR solution for a single
> server? Is this a place where using an external HD is out of the question?
I wish I could decide that, but that's not how things work around here. My
solution would have been very different ;-) Fact is that these systems
have been bought with a tape drive in each (think thousand systems in a
few hundred locations) and one of the decided workflows is that a single
tape backup can be made in order to restore and troubleshoot it locally.
Not sure how often that will happen, but alas...
> Because otherwise I would suspect that much more people would benefit
> from good support for bootable HDs with backup data on them than from
> OBDR support...
> BTW, in trunk we already have support for USBFS which you could try out.
> I believe however that this code needs a medium rewrite before we can
> release it as production stable. Amongst others it should use udev for
> persistent device names and share more code with NETFS...
Our second scenario for real D&R could make use of it, but I fear they are
going to rely on tapes (and only tapes) again.
Thanks for the information though !
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
More information about the rear-users