[Rear-users] BACULA support added to ReaR

Schlomo Schapiro schlomo at schapiro.org
Thu Dec 16 09:46:30 CET 2010


Hi,

would be nice if you could take the existing BEXTRACT patch and merge it
into BACULA, or add your own ideas and add the improved version of
BEXTRACT to the same SF patch ticket (maybe you can explain us
non-Bacula-users why it needs to be separate).

Kind Regards,
Schlomo

Am 16.12.2010 01:06, schrieb Stephens, Bill {PBSG}:
> Thanks for the info.  It looks like we were both thinking alike.  This is my first foray into sourceforge so I didn't even see the patches section until you mentioned it.  What's the correct etiquette?  Should I wait until your patch is accepted and pull down that trunk, or apply your patch to the current trunk, and add my changes?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dag Wieers [mailto:dag at wieers.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:57 PM
> To: Discussions about Relax & Recover
> Subject: Re: [Rear-users] BACULA support added to ReaR
> 
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Gratien D'haese wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for the patch and I had a look into it.
>> My first impression is to
>> merge the BACKUP method BACULA and BEXTRACT into BACULA.
>> The bextract
>> method could be triggered by the presence of BEXTRACT_VOL and BEXTRACT_MP
>> variables
>> which must be defined in the /etc/rear/local.conf (I guess).
>> For
>> the rest I don't see much difference, or am I wrong?
>>
>> Currently, in the
>> mkrescue or mkbackup work-flow we do not check the existence of a
>> backup
>> made by bacula. Therefore, I would keep it together.
>> What are your
>> thoughts?
> 
> Be careful, we already submitted a patch a few weeks ago for the same 
> purpose. it's available through the sourceforge patch interface.
> 




More information about the rear-users mailing list