[Rear-users] /etc/sysconfig/rear ?
Werner Flamme
werner.flamme at ufz.de
Mon Aug 31 12:17:12 CEST 2009
Schlomo Schapiro [31.08.2009 11:15]:
> Hi,
>
> somebody suggested adding another configuration file /etc/sysconfig/rear
> to be more LSB compliant and maybe integrate with existing management
> tools for /etc/sysconfig/* files.
>
> What is your opinion about this?
>
> Would you scratch one of local.conf or site.conf in favour of
> /etc/sysconfig/rear or should it be just an additional config file?
>
> What would be the best order of sourcing between /etc/sysconfig/rear and
> /etc/rear/*.conf (meaning, which file should be read last)?
>
Hi Schlomo,
since most files in /etc/sysconfig give basic configuration, I would not
drop local.conf or site.conf for it. Maybe it could replace
default.conf, or the basic files /etc/rear/Linux-${ARCH}.conf.
Therefore, I'd suggest that it is read first, and /etc/rear/*.conf
afterwards.
When using as an additional file - what should be configured there?
Regards,
Werner
More information about the rear-users
mailing list